Mudsex apocalypse?

Started by KankWhisperer, December 24, 2013, 12:46:34 PM

Quote from: slvrmoontiger on December 25, 2013, 02:01:18 AM
Northerners are violent. Just because you haven't played in Tuluk don't assume they aren't violent.

How did you make the assumption, from Kronibas's joke about northies being soft, that he's never played in Tuluk?
*confusion*

Quote from: manipura on December 25, 2013, 02:22:01 AM
Quote from: slvrmoontiger on December 25, 2013, 02:01:18 AM
Northerners are violent. Just because you haven't played in Tuluk don't assume they aren't violent.

How did you make the assumption, from Kronibas's joke about northies being soft, that he's never played in Tuluk?
*confusion*


I probably make fun of Tuluk more than anyone else on the GDB, even though 80% of my characters are played there.
"When I was a fighting man, the kettle-drums they beat;
The people scattered gold-dust before my horse's feet;
But now I am a great king, the people hound my track
With poison in my wine-cup, and daggers at my back."

I've yet to receive any Empirical proof that Northies are anything but tea-sipping nancies with wrists too weak to thrust a dagger.
Quote from: Agameth
Goat porn is not prohibited in the Highlord's city.

Quote from: slvrmoontiger on December 25, 2013, 02:01:18 AM
Northerners are violent. Just because you haven't played in Tuluk don't assume they aren't violent.

Oh, hi! You must be new here. :P
Quote from: Agameth
Goat porn is not prohibited in the Highlord's city.

;) What Zoan doesn't know...
Quote from: Adhira on January 01, 2014, 07:15:46 PM
I could give a shit about wholesome.


Can we just ban the horrible, unimaginative and poke-my-eyes-out-boring mudsexxers, err I mean spellers, instead of banning the hottextsex0rz?
I'm taking an indeterminate break from Armageddon for the foreseeable future and thereby am not available for mudsex.
Quote
In law a man is guilty when he violates the rights of others. In ethics he is guilty if he only thinks of doing so.

so get rid of anybody that I wouldn't mudsex basically?
Quote from: Adhira on January 01, 2014, 07:15:46 PM
I could give a shit about wholesome.

I'd mudsex you, Shal. Elegantly.
Quote from: Agameth
Goat porn is not prohibited in the Highlord's city.

Quote from: ShaLeah on December 25, 2013, 09:27:39 AM
Can we just ban the horrible, unimaginative and poke-my-eyes-out-boring mudsexxers, err I mean spellers, instead of banning the hottextsex0rz?

These usually are FTB scenes. At least I have always FTB on these people because definitely not worth my time.
I am unable to respond to PMs sent on the GDB. If you want to send me something, please send it to my email.


*Poontangeddon.
Quote from: Agameth
Goat porn is not prohibited in the Highlord's city.


Quote



Re: Mudsex apocalypse?

« Reply #84 on: December 25, 2013, 01:38:22 PM »
Reply with quote 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Quote from: ShaLeah on December 25, 2013, 06:27:39 AM

Can we just ban the horrible, unimaginative and poke-my-eyes-out-boring mudsexxers, err I mean spellers, instead of banning the hottextsex0rz?


These usually are FTB scenes. At least I have always FTB on these people because definitely not worth my time.


 


Yeah not all of us can help our spelling and grammer. It might shock you but some of us have legitimate reasons for not being the best spellers or great at grammer. (like me)
And while I apologise for my typing/spelling. Banning and or ftb and claiming not worth the time? That's bad form from where I am sitting.

Quote from: Yummri on December 26, 2013, 12:34:40 PM
Yeah not all of us can help our spelling and grammer. It might shock you but some of us have legitimate reasons for not being the best spellers or great at grammer. (like me)
And while I apologise for my typing/spelling. Banning and or ftb and claiming not worth the time? That's bad form from where I am sitting.

I think a majority of this thread should be taken in a sarcastic tone, including what she said.  :)

Everything Shaleah says should be read with a sarcastic tone, unless she is being nice.  Then, you should be afraid.... -very- afraid.
:-*
Quote from: Twilight on January 22, 2013, 08:17:47 PMGreb - To scavenge, forage, and if Whira is with you, loot the dead.
Grebber - One who grebs.

That or Yummri is really upset that ShaLeah would decide to FTB on him/her.. Way to ruin someone's holidays, ShaLeah :(
"When I was a fighting man, the kettle-drums they beat;
The people scattered gold-dust before my horse's feet;
But now I am a great king, the people hound my track
With poison in my wine-cup, and daggers at my back."

I'm not upset, and in all honesty it was taken as sarcasm. I use sarcasm a lot.

But that and the follow up of "not worth my time" seemed a little bit of a harsh response. Even the best spellers and those great with grammar typo and get it wrong. So while taking it with a pinch of salt. It still needed saying. At least I thought so.

Goddamn it ShaLeah, always ruining Christmas! Every time!
Quote from: Agameth
Goat porn is not prohibited in the Highlord's city.

Quote from: Yummri on December 26, 2013, 01:38:46 PM
I'm not upset, and in all honesty it was taken as sarcasm. I use sarcasm a lot.

But that and the follow up of "not worth my time" seemed a little bit of a harsh response. Even the best spellers and those great with grammar typo and get it wrong. So while taking it with a pinch of salt. It still needed saying. At least I thought so.

Don't feel bad. She doesn't want to do it with me either. That's OK. We'll be all celibate and productive!
Varak:You tell the mangy, pointy-eared gortok, in sirihish: "What, girl? You say the sorceror-king has fallen down the well?"
Ghardoan:A pitiful voice rises from the well below, "I've fallen and I can't get up..."

if someone doesn't like your grammar and your grammar doesn't get their rocks off and they ask for ftb it is not bad form, deal with it.

if however they avoid you entirely because of your spelling and grammar, you need to ask yourself just how high your standards are for spelling/grammar or you need to consider that maybe you are just that awful, and try to get some help improving if at all possible.
Quote from: Adhira on January 01, 2014, 07:15:46 PM
I could give a shit about wholesome.

Quote from: Barzalene on December 26, 2013, 02:34:43 PM
That's OK. We'll be all celibate and productive!

Quote
Whatever happens, happens.

In spirit of a long forgotten poster...
My position is unassailable.
Quote from: Adhira on January 01, 2014, 07:15:46 PM
I could give a shit about wholesome.

Quoteif someone doesn't like your grammar and your grammar doesn't get their rocks off and they ask for ftb it is not bad form, deal with it.

if however they avoid you entirely because of your spelling and grammar, you need to ask yourself just how high your standards are for spelling/grammar or you need to consider that maybe you are just that awful, and try to get some help improving if at all possible.

I'll view it as bad form because as I said before, it can't be helped in some cases. It is not something that can just be improved at will. And having a scene cut short for something you personally can't help, and requires a little understanding and patience is just lame.

I personally do my best, but when you can't see how a word is spelt(like me). Or you don't hear every comma, quotation, period or any other punctuation or see them or who they are used(like me) It can be hard to know how they are placed. So while I can understand from a person's prospective who is used to all these thing's prospective and give some leeway, I would expect the same respect in kind. I personally see that as only fair.

QuoteQuote from: Barzalene on Today at 11:34:43 AM

That's OK. We'll be all celibate and productive!
Can't we go someplace and snuggle? Promise I won't fad on you!

December 26, 2013, 03:34:41 PM #99 Last Edit: December 26, 2013, 03:36:57 PM by Potaje
I have been on the fence about this new rule. On one hand, fine whatever was my thought, but on the other it makes me wonder why it needs to be mandated. It seems to me that the previous allowance of the actions now banned had markers in place no less than and no greater than any other aspect in which ooc consent must be obtained to apply.

It comes across as perhaps either there are far to many cases of rape and public unwanted molestation going on with out consent for staff to handle or want to ban those individuals perpetrating them. So a mass ban has been put in place.

Other wise I can not see why staff would need to censor the game, further than the previous lines of decorum that had been set.

I feel like the issue is not so much the riddance of rape, but the blanket statement and penalty for any and all actions that display some form of advancement in sexual nature. Be it as innocent as a one person stealing a kiss from another, to the most worst of sexual torture. They are now all deemed the same severity. I have trouble with rl laws that see things so black and white and I have issue with rules in this game that would do the same.

It is not a punishment to fit a crime.

I feel that in a rush to try an augment or fix an issue things are taken to far in extreme. I think their should be some revision, but that is my own opinion as a consenting adult, able to say yes, no, stop and able to adhere to others that say yes, no and stop.

[edited] Shit wrong thread I think: (added) Mudsexing 2014!!!
The funny little foreign man

I often hear the jingle to -Riunite on ice- when I read the estate name Reynolte, eve though there ain't no ice in Zalanthas.