Surnames?

Started by Erythil, March 21, 2011, 06:05:42 PM

Would it be simply ostentatious for a commoner to style themselves with a surname, or outright treasonous?

Would be acceptable to use a father's first name in the style of a surname?

I had a thought about making a character with the full complicated gamut of Arabic names, with the 'ibn' and the 'al' and what all else...thought it might be fun in a world full of people with only one name.

i've heard surnames, and kuraci family has honorifics at the end of their names... and the families of gmh have that name (kadius, etc) as their last name. i've seen a commoner with a last name. i just don't have them, they're too complicated for peeps that will die in a real life week's time most of the time.
Quote from: Qzzrbl
THAT MAN IS DEHYDRATING!

QUICK! GIMME A BANDAGE!!

Two words.

Gage. Gritshaw.
Quote from: Marauder Moe
Oh my god he's still rocking the sandwich.

I think surnames are fine.

But we already have 'al Surname' to denote specific tribes (ie, al Seik) so if you were going to go that route, I would say you should be a tribal and it should refer to your tribe name.
Former player as of 2/27/23, sending love.

I would assume that most people have had a shitty enough life that they don't care where they come from, but are more concerned with the present and the name they'll be addressed by. Who would want to be called Slimy McSmellyballs when you could just go around as Slimy and when McSmellyballs are known to be a drunken, good for nothing lot?

I think it's more important in tribal cultures, at least it seems that way. And city elves, too, according to the docs!

But really, I think whatever you think is fine enough for the game. :)
Case: he's more likely to shoot up a mcdonalds for selling secret obama sauce on its big macs
Kismet: didn't see you in GQ homey
BadSkeelz: Whatever you say, Kim Jong Boog
Quote from: Tuannon
There is only one boog.

If you have a valid reason for it, I don't see why not. Commoner families exist, families have names.
All the world will be your enemy. When they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you; digger, listener, runner, Prince with the swift warning. Be cunning, and full of tricks, and your people will never be destroyed.

A tribal's name is typically their first name, the sub-family they're in, and the tribe name. So an Arabet might be Talia Dunefighter of the Arabet tribe, in Bendune. In sirihish, that translates to Talia Surhahah al'Arabet

If you're a human from the city and lived in a tenement with your whore mother and someone who she claimed was your older brother, then you'd have no need for a tribal name, or a sub-family name. You'd just be Amos of Tuluk. You could go ahead and get all tribal and say it's Amos Warrenswhelp al'Tuluk but no one is really going to take it very seriously.
Talia said: Notice to all: Do not mess with Lizzie's GDB. She will cut you.
Delirium said: Notice to all: do not mess with Lizzie's soap. She will cut you.

The most annoying part is when people don't realize it's fine for commoners to have a family name and you have to spend a great deal of time explaining it... It's worse if that person is a Templar or noble... Awkward...
どんと来い、生活の悪循環!!1!11
Quote from: Yam on March 18, 2011, 09:57:04 AM
There's really nothing wrong with a pretty boy in a dress.

Quote from: Xeran Van Houten on March 21, 2011, 06:29:13 PM
The most annoying part is when people don't realize it's fine for commoners to have a family name and you have to spend a great deal of time explaining it... It's worse if that person is a Templar or noble... Awkward...

"Lol, what do you -mean- you're John Smith?!"
Case: he's more likely to shoot up a mcdonalds for selling secret obama sauce on its big macs
Kismet: didn't see you in GQ homey
BadSkeelz: Whatever you say, Kim Jong Boog
Quote from: Tuannon
There is only one boog.

Quote from: Xeran Van Houten on March 21, 2011, 06:29:13 PM
The most annoying part is when people don't realize it's fine for commoners to have a family name and you have to spend a great deal of time explaining it... It's worse if that person is a Templar or noble... Awkward...

Heheheheheh.

I only had one commoner character with a surname, and there was a decent reason for having it. I'm glad I never got my balls yanked around on it.
Quote from: nessalin on July 11, 2016, 02:48:32 PM
Trunk
hidden by 'body/torso'
hides nipples

It definitely is fine to have a surname. It's also fine to have a virtual family, and virtual lovers. I was pretty annoyed when I played a character who had a living VNPC family, and VNPC boyfriends, and people kept ICly questioning their existence.  Just because your character isn't from a known, coded "official" family, doesn't mean he/she isn't one of the THOUSANDS of other non-coded, unofficial families throughout the known world. It's irksome when other players forget this and give someone shit about it in game, when it shouldn't be noteworthy at all.
Talia said: Notice to all: Do not mess with Lizzie's GDB. She will cut you.
Delirium said: Notice to all: do not mess with Lizzie's soap. She will cut you.

Quote from: Lizzie on March 21, 2011, 06:34:22 PM
It definitely is fine to have a surname. It's also fine to have a virtual family, and virtual lovers. I was pretty annoyed when I played a character who had a living VNPC family, and VNPC boyfriends, and people kept ICly questioning their existence.  Just because your character isn't from a known, coded "official" family, doesn't mean he/she isn't one of the THOUSANDS of other non-coded, unofficial families throughout the known world. It's irksome when other players forget this and give someone shit about it in game, when it shouldn't be noteworthy at all.


I've had this happen before. I wanted to smack the other PC involved. :(
All the world will be your enemy. When they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you; digger, listener, runner, Prince with the swift warning. Be cunning, and full of tricks, and your people will never be destroyed.

It's more than fine for commoners to have surnames.

Although I predict, as a result of this thread, lots of people are going to start giving their commoners surnames to prove a point.
All the world will be your enemy. When they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you; digger, listener, runner, Prince with the swift warning. Be cunning, and full of tricks, and your people will never be destroyed.

I've only seen a few surnames. My favourite being Gage Gritshaw lol. But I've seen ALOT of titles. Like Krylslayer, Mekstomper.. Stuff like that. Mostly with Half-Giants though.
Quote from: Cutthroat on August 22, 2009, 10:57:13 PMSo Eunoli Winrothol, Samos Rennik, and Thrain Ironsword walk into a bar. The Red Fang bartender looks up and says, "Get the fuck out of my bar."

Ah yes the noble Grawp Pantsshitter.

I confess I don't like them when they're grandiose. They feel so high fantasy novel, when they are.
Varak:You tell the mangy, pointy-eared gortok, in sirihish: "What, girl? You say the sorceror-king has fallen down the well?"
Ghardoan:A pitiful voice rises from the well below, "I've fallen and I can't get up..."

March 22, 2011, 12:44:16 AM #17 Last Edit: March 22, 2011, 12:51:45 AM by Jenred
There are numerous examples for the reasonable assumption of surnames.
Quintus Tektolnes and Muk Utep are two of the biggest individuals with surnames.
Then of course there are great houses (they weren't ALWAYs great, and one time they were just regular familes).
Tribal surnames, Gypsy surnames.

I think whats important though, before a big wave of surnames appears, is establishing some of the backstory for surnames.
Surnames can be patronymic or matronymic; occupational, locational, ornamental, etc. and while it might not be necessary for your character to know where there surname came from, I think it can definitely be a nice facet of character depth to at least have some thought in it - even if that thought was "I adopted that name because it sounded nice" - thus being an ornamental surname.

I agree that I, personally, don't like grandiose sounding surnames, but thats more of a personal taste. Historically, people without surnames tended to adopt overly grandiose sounding surnames - or conversely very plain sounding (de-slaved Blacks tended to either go simplistic, based on Presidents).

It would be nice if someone wanted to take the time to make some default Zalanthan surname stuff, perhaps relative to the major cities.

Whats interesting is that due to the transliteration of English into Zalanthas, several "earth-sounding" names would actually be viable. There are still Coopers, Carvers, Potters, Mason, Porter, Sawbones, etc.
Quote from: SynthesisI always thought of jozhals as like...reptilian wallabies.

Quote from: FiveDisgruntledMonkeysWitI pictured them as cute, glittery mini-velociraptors.
Kinda like a My Little Pony that could eat your face.

Quote from: Jenred on March 22, 2011, 12:44:16 AM
There are numerous examples for the reasonable assumption of surnames.
Quintus Tektolnes and Muk Utep are two of the biggest individuals with surnames.
Then of course there are great houses (they weren't ALWAYs great, and one time they were just regular familes).
Tribal surnames, Gypsy surnames.

I think the issue is that a lot of commoners don't seem to have surnames. It seems like a middle/upper class thing, like silk :P

There's not really a lot of people on Zalanthas, so I can see how people don't have surnames. People don't take their heritage too seriously. A child of a dungsweeper or miner doesn't need to glorify their heritage. I could see it being useful as a label for popular names, like Amos Bynner, Amos Smith, Amos Sharp, Amos Tokfecker.

I wonder if things like the Arabian 'surnames', where person is "John son of Malik", would apply to Zalanthas.
Quote from: Rahnevyn on March 09, 2009, 03:39:45 PM
Clans can give stat bonuses and penalties, too. The Byn drop in wisdom is particularly notorious.

Quote from: SMuz on March 22, 2011, 05:23:34 AM
A child of a dungsweeper or miner doesn't need to glorify their heritage. I could see it being useful as a label for popular names, like Amos Bynner, Amos Smith, Amos Sharp, Amos Tokfecker.

I wonder if things like the Arabian 'surnames', where person is "John son of Malik", would apply to Zalanthas.

Thats what I was meaning when I said that it would be neat if someone wrote up something that got approved as at least a "default" for Allanak or Tuluk. Like... in Allanak the COMMON (not necessarily mandatory) thing is that people's surnames are occupational, or non-existent, or genealogical.
Quote from: SynthesisI always thought of jozhals as like...reptilian wallabies.

Quote from: FiveDisgruntledMonkeysWitI pictured them as cute, glittery mini-velociraptors.
Kinda like a My Little Pony that could eat your face.

Rarely have I made a commoner with a surname, but I've had numerous tribal characters with multiple names.  I don't see anything wrong with it and would encourage more people to add that bit of personality to their characters.  If anything, it makes you think a bit deeper on your character's lineage.
Murder, Corruption, Betrayal and Pancakes.

You don't need a mandate from up on high for this sort of thing.  Not to say throwing a Question? through the request system isn't a good idea, but it's a name.  Unless Staff comes out and says it doesn't fit the theme, flock it.

Malek Stonechipper
Malek son of Malek
Malek McMalekson (maybe not this one)
Malek Hunter
Malek Greyhuntrunnerup (yeah, probably not this one either)
Malek Amosus

Best bet is just to include your whole name in your background with the reasoning for it i.e.  Malek Stonechipper has been a stonecarver for decades like his father before him and his father before him OR Malek Amosus once saved Amos Kadius' life from a mugger and took the agents name as an honor for this act.   If staff doesn't think it fits for whatever reason you'll find out why right from the start!

I personally like the idea of occupational last names but that's only because they serve a purpose to the higher-ups ala classifying all the plebs for easy identification.  IMHO only!
Quote from: ZhairaI don't really have a problem with drugs OR sex
Quote from: MansaMarc's got the best advice.
Quote from: WarriorPoetIf getting loaded and screwing is wrong, I don't wanna be right.

I like surnames as they normally show that the player has put a bit more thought into their pc rather than just a bunch of skills with a face, the more you go back into how your pc was brought up and how his family was the more real the pc begins to feel. Giving your pc a last name that is a reminder to his lineage does a lot in accomplishing that IMO. A pet peeve of mine does involve the silly surnames that just feel so high-fantasy or superhero.
A staff member sends you:
"Normally we don't see a <redacted> walk into a room full of <redacted> and start indiscriminately killing."

You send to staff:
"Welcome to Armageddon."

Surnames make sense for some characters, and don't for others.

Amos the orphan grebber probably doesn't have a surname, unless it's assumed or something. Malik, a member of a little trading family, on the other hand, is far more likely to have a surname, for business reasons as much as cultural ones.
All the world will be your enemy. When they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you; digger, listener, runner, Prince with the swift warning. Be cunning, and full of tricks, and your people will never be destroyed.

March 22, 2011, 07:38:41 PM #24 Last Edit: March 22, 2011, 07:41:25 PM by Reiteration
I enjoy surnames that represent someone's profession, placed at either end of the given name. As well as representing someone's heritage/bloodline.
Kir Builder
Crafter Ightina
Hixup Hunter
Grebber Etrr
Stonechipper Malek, son of Amos

Some however shouldn't be used unless you're a real badass.
Assassin Stanz, Shadowblade of Tektolnes

scratch that, I wouldn't advise using that in the first place.
"Brain wave, main wave"
Psycho got a high kick
Collect and select
Show me your best set