"Bad practice" in equipment/descriptions.

Started by Only He Stands There, July 17, 2008, 04:23:40 PM

QuoteOoh...You mean like making your pc have the sdesc...The brown-haired man...and then making him a natorious sorcerer?

Yeah, I have to agree with you, that is pretty bad.

From Desertman in another thread.

To avoid potentially derailing, I'd like to start a topic on this. Without further ado...


What the hell's wrong with that? If I wanted to make an average brown-haired Amos with a four-line description and make him a sorcerer, what's the problem? I like short, concise, to-the-point descriptions.

Now, I'm not advocating making a "tall, muscular man" sorcerer, because that's just a bit straddling the proverbial OOC line (since the 'tall, muscular man' sdesc is so beheld as 'the average description,' not because tall muscular men can't be sorcerers).

On the same line, if I have "the slender, black-haired elf" and he turns out to be a Nilazi, what's wrong with that? There's no stipulation that sorcerers have to have 15-line descriptions or exploding thesaurus emotes.

July 17, 2008, 04:25:51 PM #1 Last Edit: July 17, 2008, 04:31:23 PM by Desertman
Ummm dude...there is a big OOC reference to "the brown-haired man" there that I dont think you got.

But that does bring up a new topic...

For a while we had an influx of shady rinthers who chose animal names as alias's, so you couldnt find thier minds via the Way by using just thier names.

Vestric, Serpent, Scrab, ect...

I dont blame them.

Sure its kind of OOC, but I never did like the concept of finding someone's mind that you have never met by just using thier name.

I wish there was code in place to prevent you from "Contacting" someone if you havent actually been in the same room as them before to make yourself "familiar" with thier minds.

It always bothered me to see...


The blue-eyed man says in sirihish, "His name is John, see if you can find his mind to recruit you."

The elf nods.

The elf says in sirihish, "I got his mind, thanks."



Its like...Wow, you heard the name John and suddenly you can locate his mind out of hundreds of millions of other minds in the world.
Quote from: James de Monet on April 09, 2015, 01:54:57 AM
My phone now autocorrects "damn" to Dman.
Quote from: deathkamon on November 14, 2015, 12:29:56 AM
The young daughter has been filled.

For sdescs, I don't think there's anything wrong with picking something simple if your character truly is physically unremarkable.

However, similar to how I feel about Desertman's anti-raiding strategy, I feel that writing a main description of a much lower quality than you are capable of for the purposes of making people OOCly underestimate your character is just as bad as people estimating characters by the quality of their descriptions in the first place.  Two wrongs not making a right, and all.

I do agree with him that some past 'rinthers have gone by borderline OOCly-exploitive aliases.

The whole practice of using aliases because there may be a variety of coded advantages to doing so is really, really bad. And yet it seems like almost everyone does it. I always feel like I must be the odd one out when my characters go around handing out their real names rather than using aliases.
Quote from: Vanth on February 13, 2008, 05:27:50 PM
I'm gonna go all Gimfalisette on you guys and lay down some numbers.

Quote from: Gimfalisette on July 17, 2008, 04:42:14 PM
The whole practice of using aliases because there may be a variety of unintentional coded advantages to doing so is really, really bad. And yet it seems like almost everyone does it. I always feel like I must be the odd one out when my characters go around handing out their real names rather than using aliases.

There. Fixed. There ARE some ways that things are coded ON PURPOSE in this arena.
There is no general doctrine which is not capable of eating out our morality if unchecked by the deep-seated habit of direct fellow-feeling with individual fellow-men. -George Eliot

Quote from: Tisiphone on July 17, 2008, 04:46:10 PM
Quote from: Gimfalisette on July 17, 2008, 04:42:14 PM
The whole practice of using aliases because there may be a variety of unintentional coded advantages to doing so is really, really bad. And yet it seems like almost everyone does it. I always feel like I must be the odd one out when my characters go around handing out their real names rather than using aliases.

There. Fixed. There ARE some ways that things are coded ON PURPOSE in this arena.

It's not fixed. Just because some of those things are intentionally coded shouldn't mean that the vast majority of characters somehow have experience with this and thus have never told anyone their real name.
Quote from: Vanth on February 13, 2008, 05:27:50 PM
I'm gonna go all Gimfalisette on you guys and lay down some numbers.

Quote from: Gimfalisette on July 17, 2008, 04:52:24 PM
It's not fixed. Just because some of those things are intentionally coded shouldn't mean that the vast majority of characters somehow have experience with this and thus have never told anyone their real name.

I dunno...with most humanoids using the Way on a regular basis, wouldn't they know that a person could be contacted by his regular name but not by an alias?
The sword is sharp, the spear is long,
The arrow swift, the Gate is strong.
The heart is bold that looks on gold;
The dwarves no more shall suffer wrong.

I actually really like Desertman's idea. I get sick and tired of jackasses contacting then ceasing for the soul purpose of getting my sdesc. The idea makes sense.

Quote from: brytta.leofa on July 17, 2008, 05:00:31 PM
I dunno...with most humanoids using the Way on a regular basis, wouldn't they know that a person could be contacted by his regular name but not by an alias?

Except that it is possible to contact anyone with any keyword that's on their character. I'm talking about use of a keyworded alias in place of a real name.

Using some alias that's not even a keyword, I would see that as total OOC abuse, honestly. That's just entirely trying to get around the code, since no one can target you in any way, for anything, with a non-keyword alias.
Quote from: Vanth on February 13, 2008, 05:27:50 PM
I'm gonna go all Gimfalisette on you guys and lay down some numbers.

Quote from: Gimfalisette on July 17, 2008, 05:03:02 PM
Using some alias that's not even a keyword, I would see that as total OOC abuse, honestly. That's just entirely trying to get around the code, since no one can target you in any way, for anything, with a non-keyword alias.

Oh, gotcha. I agree.
The sword is sharp, the spear is long,
The arrow swift, the Gate is strong.
The heart is bold that looks on gold;
The dwarves no more shall suffer wrong.

Quote from: Gimfalisette on July 17, 2008, 04:42:14 PM
The whole practice of using aliases because there may be a variety of coded advantages to doing so is really, really bad. And yet it seems like almost everyone does it. I always feel like I must be the odd one out when my characters go around handing out their real names rather than using aliases.

I disagree.  I think that in the scope of the world there are far larger problems than twinking.

Hell, I think that even in the scope of the --game-- there are far greater problems than twinking.

Twinking is an inevitable consequence of a video-game.  Some people are going to exploit the underlying "physics" of the game world.

Quote from: Gimfalisette on July 17, 2008, 05:03:02 PM
Using some alias that's not even a keyword, I would see that as total OOC abuse, honestly. That's just entirely trying to get around the code, since no one can target you in any way, for anything, with a non-keyword alias.

I don't necessarily agree, and would point out that this statement opens up another hot-thread topic. However, I don't think this is something we can argue so much as request a staff position. It depends on how the Way works.
There is no general doctrine which is not capable of eating out our morality if unchecked by the deep-seated habit of direct fellow-feeling with individual fellow-men. -George Eliot

Quote from: Tisiphone on July 17, 2008, 06:17:25 PM
Quote from: Gimfalisette on July 17, 2008, 05:03:02 PM
Using some alias that's not even a keyword, I would see that as total OOC abuse, honestly. That's just entirely trying to get around the code, since no one can target you in any way, for anything, with a non-keyword alias.

I don't necessarily agree, and would point out that this statement opens up another hot-thread topic. However, I don't think this is something we can argue so much as request a staff position. It depends on how the Way works.

It doesn't depend on Way mechanics at all. If someone is using a non-keyword alias, you can't target them using that alias, period. If they're also just one hooded figure out of a few in the room, or otherwise have some kind of really common keywords going on in all you can see of their keywords, then that's an OOC problem...not an IC one. They're relying on the way the code works with keywords to disadvantage other players, which is abusive. For the most part, as Moe mentioned, I've only seen this type of strategy from 'rinthi characters.
Quote from: Vanth on February 13, 2008, 05:27:50 PM
I'm gonna go all Gimfalisette on you guys and lay down some numbers.

Quote from: Gimfalisette on July 17, 2008, 06:30:26 PM
It doesn't depend on Way mechanics at all. If someone is using a non-keyword alias, you can't target them using that alias, period. If they're also just one hooded figure out of a few in the room, or otherwise have some kind of really common keywords going on in all you can see of their keywords, then that's an OOC problem...not an IC one. They're relying on the way the code works with keywords to disadvantage other players, which is abusive. For the most part, as Moe mentioned, I've only seen this type of strategy from 'rinthi characters.

Then again, they're only doing this to avoid sdesc sniffing, which relies on the way the code works with keywords to advantage themselves, which is abusive.

Quote from: Gimfalisette on July 17, 2008, 04:42:14 PM
The whole practice of using aliases because there may be a variety of coded advantages to doing so is really, really bad. And yet it seems like almost everyone does it. I always feel like I must be the odd one out when my characters go around handing out their real names rather than using aliases.

You are not the odd man out, I tend to go with my real name or a nickname (Never tend to do nicknames unless desert elf really). That I add to my keywords, WHICH lets you contact me even if my nickname is Bubblegum.


Fix to quote the right thing.
"Don't take life too seriously, nobody ever makes it out alive anyway."

Quote from: Qzzrbl on July 17, 2008, 08:43:31 PM
Quote from: Gimfalisette on July 17, 2008, 06:30:26 PM
It doesn't depend on Way mechanics at all. If someone is using a non-keyword alias, you can't target them using that alias, period. If they're also just one hooded figure out of a few in the room, or otherwise have some kind of really common keywords going on in all you can see of their keywords, then that's an OOC problem...not an IC one. They're relying on the way the code works with keywords to disadvantage other players, which is abusive. For the most part, as Moe mentioned, I've only seen this type of strategy from 'rinthi characters.

Then again, they're only doing this to avoid sdesc sniffing, which relies on the way the code works with keywords to advantage themselves, which is abusive.

Two wrongs never make a right.
Quote from: Vanth on February 13, 2008, 05:27:50 PM
I'm gonna go all Gimfalisette on you guys and lay down some numbers.

Personally, I think people that use the uberimaginative-sdesc, withlettersalloverthekeyboard-haired men to be abusing the code than people that use animal aliases. When in a pinch, I'm gonna fucking mispell that shit when my adrenaline is pumping. Afterwords, I don't remember what Cerulean means, and I'm not going to remember a word I've never heard. Not to mention that they won't use that word in their main description, so I can't fucking figure out that when they have aqua in their description, they really have cerulean in their sdesc.

It is only natural to call people an animal name if they resemble that name. Serpent was a slick mother fucker, for sure. Vestric was flighty. Scrab was hard headed. Gortok was a rough sumbitch. Tembo was a fierce sumbitch. Durrit, rat, spider, butcher, kank, etc.. I've known all of these characters and everytime, they usually had a personality that resembled the beast they were named after in some way.
Quote from: Cutthroat on September 30, 2008, 10:15:55 PM
> forage artifacts

You find a rusty, armed landmine and pick it up.

Quote from: Delstro on July 17, 2008, 09:09:48 PM
Personally, I think people that use the uberimaginative-sdesc, withlettersalloverthekeyboard-haired men to be abusing the code than people that use animal aliases. When in a pinch, I'm gonna fucking mispell that shit when my adrenaline is pumping. Afterwords, I don't remember what Cerulean means, and I'm not going to remember a word I've never heard. Not to mention that they won't use that word in their main description, so I can't fucking figure out that when they have aqua in their description, they really have cerulean in their sdesc.

It is only natural to call people an animal name if they resemble that name. Serpent was a slick mother fucker, for sure. Vestric was flighty. Scrab was hard headed. Gortok was a rough sumbitch. Tembo was a fierce sumbitch. Durrit, rat, spider, butcher, kank, etc.. I've known all of these characters and everytime, they usually had a personality that resembled the beast they were named after in some way.

At the risk of derailing this shit, Serpent was an awesome motherfucker.  Best Rinther ever.

Some of the most memorable characters I've ever met have been fairly lackluster in the sdesc and mdesc department.

I've seen people with sdescs like... (not exact) the short, dark-haired man; the brown-haired man; the tall, muscular man (there was one that wasn't a twink... or a noob); the short, black-haired man. The blonde-haired man, and I've never really noticed this to be a problem.

I don't care if they are a sorcerer. Just because someone is a sorcerer, or a psionic, or an uber-powerful nilazi, doesn't mean they will necessarily look unlike the common man you never suspect of anything.
Quote from: SynthesisI always thought of jozhals as like...reptilian wallabies.

Quote from: FiveDisgruntledMonkeysWitI pictured them as cute, glittery mini-velociraptors.
Kinda like a My Little Pony that could eat your face.

Quote from: Gimfalisette on July 17, 2008, 05:03:02 PM
Using some alias that's not even a keyword, I would see that as total OOC abuse, honestly. That's just entirely trying to get around the code, since no one can target you in any way, for anything, with a non-keyword alias.

You don't even have to -have- an alias as a keyword, so why is having one that makes you not target able bad?

 

I tripped and Fale down my stairs. Drink milk and you'll grow Uaptal. I know this guy from the state of Tenneshi. This house will go up Borsail tomorrow. I gave my book to him Nenyuk it back again. I hired this guy golfing to Kadius around for a while.

Quote from: Delstro on July 17, 2008, 09:09:48 PM
Personally, I think people that use the uberimaginative-sdesc, withlettersalloverthekeyboard-haired men to be abusing the code than people that use animal aliases. When in a pinch, I'm gonna fucking mispell that shit when my adrenaline is pumping.

Just a tip in case you use a client that features it.  After using zMUD/CMUD for the last decade+ I found out about six months back that they have tab completion.  When someone has a word I don't feel like typing, for instance your example cerulean, I can type cer or ceru then hit tab and it completes it for me. 

Also, I find nothing wrong with that.  People want unique sdesc and I know I for one put ALOT of time in mine.  I find it's the sexiest part of my character.

Brandon
Quote from: Ghost on December 16, 2009, 06:15:17 PM
brandon....

you did the biggest mistake of your life

I think by "alias" they don't mean the game command alias, or a game client alias. I think they mean alias as in its usual meaning: an alternative name that your character calls himself to certain people, and not to others.

Like a guy whose real name is John Smith, but tells the girl he wants to impress his name is Pierre Jesuis. Pierre Jesuis would be his alias. And in the game, if he doesn't use the addkeyword command to make sure that Pierre Jesuis is added as actual keywords, then the girl he wants to impress won't be able to profess her undying love to him, because she'll keep trying to type tell pierre and keep coming up with an error. Because according to the game code, there is no Pierre in the room.

Edited to add: Brandon makes sexy sdescs.
Talia said: Notice to all: Do not mess with Lizzie's GDB. She will cut you.
Delirium said: Notice to all: do not mess with Lizzie's soap. She will cut you.

Tab completion is sexy.
There is no general doctrine which is not capable of eating out our morality if unchecked by the deep-seated habit of direct fellow-feeling with individual fellow-men. -George Eliot

Quote from: Qzzrbl on July 17, 2008, 08:43:31 PM
Quote from: Gimfalisette on July 17, 2008, 06:30:26 PM
It doesn't depend on Way mechanics at all. If someone is using a non-keyword alias, you can't target them using that alias, period. If they're also just one hooded figure out of a few in the room, or otherwise have some kind of really common keywords going on in all you can see of their keywords, then that's an OOC problem...not an IC one. They're relying on the way the code works with keywords to disadvantage other players, which is abusive. For the most part, as Moe mentioned, I've only seen this type of strategy from 'rinthi characters.

Then again, they're only doing this to avoid sdesc sniffing, which relies on the way the code works with keywords to advantage themselves, which is abusive.

Even dressed up with the best of rationalizations, this is still pretty obviously code abuse, IMHO.
"No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality; even larks and katydids are supposed, by some, to dream." - Shirley Jackson, The Haunting of Hill House

Quote from: flurry on July 17, 2008, 10:46:53 PM
Quote from: Qzzrbl on July 17, 2008, 08:43:31 PM
Quote from: Gimfalisette on July 17, 2008, 06:30:26 PM
It doesn't depend on Way mechanics at all. If someone is using a non-keyword alias, you can't target them using that alias, period. If they're also just one hooded figure out of a few in the room, or otherwise have some kind of really common keywords going on in all you can see of their keywords, then that's an OOC problem...not an IC one. They're relying on the way the code works with keywords to disadvantage other players, which is abusive. For the most part, as Moe mentioned, I've only seen this type of strategy from 'rinthi characters.

Then again, they're only doing this to avoid sdesc sniffing, which relies on the way the code works with keywords to advantage themselves, which is abusive.

Even dressed up with the best of rationalizations, this is still pretty obviously code abuse, IMHO.

The code it circumvents is a really annoying and plot-ruining bit of code, but being as you're still abusing the code to get around it, I'm going to have to agree.  I've personally never even considered giving an alias and then not adding it to my keywords--if someone knows me by a name, they should be able to target me with that name, regardless of what OOC consequences it may have.
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."

--Alan Moore