Psionics: Ideas and discussion on etiquette

[th3kaiser]

You're not wrong about them magickers being deadlier. But it's more about having a magickal sub that compliments the mundane guild well and less about the actual magick. They're basically a ranger/warrior/whatever with a few x-men powers.

[Jihelu]

I thought I'd never say this.



Psionics would be cooler if it were broken up into subguilds.

[th3kaiser]

I don't know that I agree. I already feel bad for the players of Psionicists. It has such a high difficulty already, I don't really think making their endgame weaker is really a thing we'd want.

[Reiloth]

I don't know that I agree. I already feel bad for the players of Psionicists. It has such a high difficulty already, I don't really think making their endgame weaker is really a thing we'd want.

I agree -- If anything, I would like the subguilds to be as powerful as a full psion, with just different foci.

[Delirium]

If you have a secret to keep (and are a responsible roleplayer), psionicists are terrifying.

That's all I'll say about that, I guess.

[path]

If you have a secret to keep (and are a responsible roleplayer), psionicists are terrifying.

That's all I'll say about that, I guess.

I feel really happy I'm not alone in finding psionics still relevant and scary right now.

[Patuk]

(and are a responsible roleplayer)

Shit. That's a pretty high bar to set.

[path]

(and are a responsible roleplayer)

Shit. That's a pretty high bar to set.

Patuk, you're so jaded! Sit down. Have some tea with me, my darling. Our playerbase is what makes this game. They are the pulse and the blood.