Know who is Waying you.

[slvrmoontiger]

I asked a question to the staff a while back on if there is a IG reason why you can't figure out who Way's you or if that's just how things were coded. The answer was that's just the way it was coded.

I remember way back when a time when you didn't even get the A foreign presence reaches your mind or whatever it is. In fact one of the stories recently showed shows this. Well I'm wondering why it just can't be coded to said "The green-skinned breed reaches your mind". I'm not sure how much work this would involve codedly speaking, but I think it would be a nice thing to have.

[Desertman]

I asked a question to the staff a while back on if there is a IG reason why you can't figure out who Way's you or if that's just how things were coded. The answer was that's just the way it was coded.

I remember way back when a time when you didn't even get the A foreign presence reaches your mind or whatever it is. In fact one of the stories recently showed shows this. Well I'm wondering why it just can't be coded to said "The green-skinned breed reaches your mind". I'm not sure how much work this would involve codedly speaking, but I think it would be a nice thing to have.

There is already a huge thread that I don't feel like searching up where all of this is covered. You should be able to find it.

With that being said, the meat and potatoes you will want from it is this.

Staff already said they have been working on/throwing around a project that would require people to know your exact sdesc in order to find your mind. Basically, they would have had to have met you IC'ly at one point to find your mind with the Way. (If they are already in the room with you, they can "contact figure", of course.)

This will/should get rid of all of the randoms who hear your name in a bar finding your mind just to sniff your sdesc.

[Lizzie]

I asked a question to the staff a while back on if there is a IG reason why you can't figure out who Way's you or if that's just how things were coded. The answer was that's just the way it was coded.

I remember way back when a time when you didn't even get the A foreign presence reaches your mind or whatever it is. In fact one of the stories recently showed shows this. Well I'm wondering why it just can't be coded to said "The green-skinned breed reaches your mind". I'm not sure how much work this would involve codedly speaking, but I think it would be a nice thing to have.

There is already a huge thread that I don't feel like searching up where all of this is covered. You should be able to find it.

With that being said, the meat and potatoes you will want from it is this.

Staff already said they have been working on/throwing around a project that would require people to know your exact sdesc in order to find your mind. Basically, they would have had to have met you IC'ly at one point to find your mind with the Way. (If they are already in the room with you, they can "contact figure", of course.)

This will/should get rid of all of the randoms who hear your name in a bar finding your mind just to sniff your sdesc.

This will also present even more limited opportunity for sponsored roles/leadership roles to hire people, because potential employees might need to actually MEET their prospective employer, but the employer doesn't know that they're looking for them, and since the candidate hasn't ever met the leader, he is no longer codedly able to way him to say "hey - I exist, Grumpy told me to find your mind to see if you'd interview me, I'm at Trader's."

I think a change like that won't solve any problem than a minor annoyance, and has the potential to be a game-breaker for new players who are trying to meet this week's Byn Sergeant, who spends most of his time in the compound, whose mind is totally available for contact, but you no longer are able to contact him unless you've already met him.

[FreeRangeVestric]

Or worse...It will lead to even more of one of my pet peeves, people going, "Yeah, you know, Sergeant Amos. He's, like, a tall, muscular man. Can't miss him!"

[Desertman]

I asked a question to the staff a while back on if there is a IG reason why you can't figure out who Way's you or if that's just how things were coded. The answer was that's just the way it was coded.

I remember way back when a time when you didn't even get the A foreign presence reaches your mind or whatever it is. In fact one of the stories recently showed shows this. Well I'm wondering why it just can't be coded to said "The green-skinned breed reaches your mind". I'm not sure how much work this would involve codedly speaking, but I think it would be a nice thing to have.

There is already a huge thread that I don't feel like searching up where all of this is covered. You should be able to find it.

With that being said, the meat and potatoes you will want from it is this.

Staff already said they have been working on/throwing around a project that would require people to know your exact sdesc in order to find your mind. Basically, they would have had to have met you IC'ly at one point to find your mind with the Way. (If they are already in the room with you, they can "contact figure", of course.)

This will/should get rid of all of the randoms who hear your name in a bar finding your mind just to sniff your sdesc.

This will also present even more limited opportunity for sponsored roles/leadership roles to hire people, because potential employees might need to actually MEET their prospective employer, but the employer doesn't know that they're looking for them, and since the candidate hasn't ever met the leader, he is no longer codedly able to way him to say "hey - I exist, Grumpy told me to find your mind to see if you'd interview me, I'm at Trader's."

I think a change like that won't solve any problem than a minor annoyance, and has the potential to be a game-breaker for new players who are trying to meet this week's Byn Sergeant, who spends most of his time in the compound, whose mind is totally available for contact, but you no longer are able to contact him unless you've already met him.

If he's doing it right, he himself and his people should be readily available enough to get newb A and B to an interview in short order. I see what you are saying, I just don't necessarily agree it is as much of a game breaker as you think it might be for new players.

I'm willing to admit in this disagreement about hypotheticals there exists the possibility I am wrong.

[Desertman]

Or worse...It will lead to even more of one of my pet peeves, people going, "Yeah, you know, Sergeant Amos. He's, like, a tall, muscular man. Can't miss him!"

This is what the request tool/report function is for. I always report these people. I haven't seen it this blatant in a while though, which is a good thing.

[slvrmoontiger]

I had a previous character that was once told IG by another character that thieves and assassins use the way to contact you and leave and contact and leave to throw you off your guard.

I've had characters in the past that were directly Way'd over and over again by people (I'm sure just to upset my character). Personally I think this should be labeled as abuse, however its not considered that way. There are other ways IG IC'ly to upset, frighten, scare, terrify, etc another character. I just think that Waying to do it is OOC'dly a childish way of doing it and personally speaking poor RP. I think knowing the sdesc of whoever contacts you would put an end to this.

I don't think you should be unable to contact someone you haven't met perse I just think they should know who you are if you are contacting them, at the time the minds link.

[Desertman]

I had a previous character that was once told IG by another character that thieves and assassins use the way to contact you and leave and contact and leave to throw you off your guard.

I've had characters in the past that were directly Way'd over and over again by people (I'm sure just to upset my character). Personally I think this should be labeled as abuse, however its not considered that way. There are other ways IG IC'ly to upset, frighten, scare, terrify, etc another character. I just think that Waying to do it is OOC'dly a childish way of doing it and personally speaking poor RP. I think knowing the sdesc of whoever contacts you would put an end to this.

I don't think you should be unable to contact someone you haven't met perse I just think they should know who you are if you are contacting them, at the time the minds link.

Them contacting you and leaving your mind repeatedly is a perfectly IC way of annoying you IC'ly. The IC counters are barrier and expel. The fact you let it annoy you OOC'ly is probably just a bonus to them.

When this...step back...breathe...remember only a game...chuckle...react IC.

[slvrmoontiger]

I had a previous character that was once told IG by another character that thieves and assassins use the way to contact you and leave and contact and leave to throw you off your guard.

I've had characters in the past that were directly Way'd over and over again by people (I'm sure just to upset my character). Personally I think this should be labeled as abuse, however its not considered that way. There are other ways IG IC'ly to upset, frighten, scare, terrify, etc another character. I just think that Waying to do it is OOC'dly a childish way of doing it and personally speaking poor RP. I think knowing the sdesc of whoever contacts you would put an end to this.

I don't think you should be unable to contact someone you haven't met perse I just think they should know who you are if you are contacting them, at the time the minds link.

Them contacting you and leaving your mind repeatedly is a perfectly IC way of annoying you IC'ly. The IC counters are barrier and expel. The fact you let it annoy you OOC'ly is probably just a bonus to them.

When this...step back...breathe...remember only a game...chuckle...react IC.

Like I said this seems petty and childish for anyone that would sink to this low of a level when there are other ways. Plus its potentially dangerous for very REAL OOC reasons depending on how often its happening. Lets say 15 times in 30 minutes. I find that a little excessive and it shouldn't be allowed. Something like that is really petty and childish. Luckily for the character of mine in the past that happened to he wasn't anywhere dangerous and I could just laugh it off as someone being petty and childish.

[Nyr]

Didn't you put in a complaint about that?  Didn't we tell you it wasn't what you thought it was?

[Desertman]

Didn't you put in a complaint about that?  Didn't we tell you it wasn't what you thought it was?

If complaint response =/= desired response, make GDB post to try and get complaint against another player validated. Let the butthurt begin to heal, unless you get told you are being a herp-derp by the community, then, pretend to not care.

Near, u so newb, u dnt understandz teh fermulas.

[ShaLeah]

I am HUGELY against anyone knowing who ways you just because you're contacted. I find that it's perfectly IC for people who are hunting you or wanting to annoy you even to be jumping in and out of your mind. Some of my characters hate it, usually the ones who have something to hide. Others don't even care.

Changing the code for an ooc annoyance is silly, especially with the amount of us who reach people by sdesc alone.

[slvrmoontiger]

I just feel there is no IC reason why you shouldn't be able to know who is contacting you. If there is someone kindly explain it.

[Desertman]

I just feel there is no IC reason why you shouldn't be able to know who is contacting you. If there is someone kindly explain it.

I'm much more interested in you explaining the IC reason behind your feeling that you SHOULD be able to know who is contacting your mind.

Please, your RL experience with psionic activity will no doubt lend valuable insight into why it is not IC for magical mind powers to not function the way you think they should.

[slvrmoontiger]

I just feel there is no IC reason why you shouldn't be able to know who is contacting you. If there is someone kindly explain it.

I'm much more interested in you explaining the IC reason behind your feeling that you SHOULD be able to know who is contacting your mind.

Please, your RL experience with psionic activity will no doubt lend valuable insight into why it is not IC for magical mind powers to not function the way you think they should.

And I suppose your RL experience with psionic activity tells why you wouldn't know.

[Desertman]

I just feel there is no IC reason why you shouldn't be able to know who is contacting you. If there is someone kindly explain it.

I'm much more interested in you explaining the IC reason behind your feeling that you SHOULD be able to know who is contacting your mind.

Please, your RL experience with psionic activity will no doubt lend valuable insight into why it is not IC for magical mind powers to not function the way you think they should.

And I suppose your RL experience with psionic activity tells why you wouldn't know.

I'm not the one with a complaint about the way it functions currently in this regard. I don't claim to know or feel that it should work one way or another.

You are the one who believes you know something more than I do. I just want you to explain what RL experience you have that gives you the below opinion you have already publically stated.

I just feel there is no IC reason why you shouldn't be able to know who is contacting you. If there is someone kindly explain it.

[Molten Heart]

I just feel there is no IC reason why you shouldn't be able to know who is contacting you. If there is someone kindly explain it.

Oddly enough there's no IC reason why you should be able to know who is contacting you either.  Or maybe there are IC reasons and we just don't know.

[slvrmoontiger]

According to a question posed in Ask The Staff there is no IC reason its coded that way.

[slvrmoontiger]

Exact post: http://gdb.armageddon.org/index.php/topic,47041.0.html

[manipura]

I just feel there is no IC reason why you shouldn't be able to know who is contacting you. If there is someone kindly explain it.

The IC reason is because it's the way it is?  It's the way staff intends it to be?  
Why should you immediately know -who- is in your mind just because they've reached you but haven't said anything?  When someone finds your mind, you feel a foreign presence.  It's a -foreign- presence because you don't know who it is.  Once they speak, then you know and it isn't foreign anymore.  It's like back in the day before caller ID.  Someone would call and you wouldn't know who it was, unless they said something.

Maybe I'm off with this, but I sort of see the Way like this:
* Someone, a foreign presence, finds my mind.  
Maybe this means I feel something in my head, a little bit of a fuzziness for a moment or a blip or a little wave or whatever you want to call it to describe it.  There's some indication in my head that my mindparts have been invaded by someone, someone has connected to me, but I don't know who.
* They linger and don't say anything.  
I don't continue to feel that strange feeling I had when they first slipped into my mindparts, this is why I don't get an echo of "You suffer from use of the Way", because they have exerted the mental energy to find me, not the other way around.  However, if I am relatively 'aware', I will know that they haven't left my head because I didn't feel the same fuzzy/blippy/wavy feeling when they broke their connection.
* They say something.
The presence in my head says something, yay!  Now I hear a thought in my mind, like someone else speaking in my head and I also have a bit of a mental image of them too because they have announced themselves to me.  So now I know that the little blip in my head is the tall, muscular man, because when he sends me a thought and I hear it in my head, the image flickering in my head is him.


It isn't the greatest explanation, but I think people sometimes want some sort of -visual- idea of how the Way works.  
That's the way that I personally think of it to come up with some sort of -how- this feels in my head and -why- it works the way it does.

Like I said this seems petty and childish for anyone that would sink to this low of a level when there are other ways. Plus its potentially dangerous for very REAL OOC reasons depending on how often its happening. Lets say 15 times in 30 minutes. I find that a little excessive and it shouldn't be allowed. Something like that is really petty and childish. Luckily for the character of mine in the past that happened to he wasn't anywhere dangerous and I could just laugh it off as someone being petty and childish.

Maybe it is petty and childish, but a lot of people (and therefore, presumably a lot of PCs) can be petty and childish.  It's the equivalent of that ten year old kid prank calling the kids in his class and hanging up without saying anything.  

I don't even know if I want to ask this, but I'm so curious that I can't -not- ask...How in the world is this "potentially dangerous for very REAL OOC reasons...?"

As well, SMT, I think you previously mentioned something about this behaviour being stopped by knowing the sdesc of someone in your head?  Also it would be stopped by having to have met the person before you can Way them?   I doubt this would stop anything.  I'd be willing to bet that the ten year old bully 'prank calling' your mind fifteen times in a half hour is someone that your character knows.  What would knowing the sdesc of the person in your head achieve anyway?  Does that mean your character would be constantly running to the Templarate/the Legion/the Arm/whoever and continually telling them "Amos keeps finding my mind and not saying anything!  Make him stop!"


Edited: Typo.  Meh.

[Desertman]

According to a question posed in Ask The Staff there is no IC reason its coded that way.

That post said no such thing.

You wish it did. But it didn't.

Because it is coded that way.

It does not say there is no IC reason why it is coded that way.

[slvrmoontiger]

According to a question posed in Ask The Staff there is no IC reason its coded that way.

That post said no such thing.

You wish it did. But it didn't.

Because it is coded that way.

It does not say there is no IC reason why it is coded that way.

Re-read the original question. It was asked if there was an IG reason for it. That was the answer received meaning that it is simply coded that way. If there was an IG reason it should have been answered that there was.

[Desertman]

According to a question posed in Ask The Staff there is no IC reason its coded that way.

That post said no such thing.

You wish it did. But it didn't.

Because it is coded that way.

It does not say there is no IC reason why it is coded that way.

Re-read the original question. It was asked if there was an IG reason for it. That was the answer received meaning that it is simply coded that way. If there was an IG reason it should have been answered that there was.

You see, you saying, "If there is no IG reason it should have been answered the way I think it should have been answered." is not only inaccurate, it is comical.

The staff is not required to answer a question the way you believe they should answer it.

The Way is not required to work the way you believe it should work. (For reasons you have still yet to give btw.)

It does not say what you want it to say. End of story. The staff is not required to follow your answering rules, and they didn't.

Their answer could and probably did mean, "It is coded that way, for IG reasons we don't want to and will not tell you. We don't even want to confirm if there are IG reasons, for reasons we aren't required to tell you Silvermoontiger."

Sorry, thus is reality.

[slvrmoontiger]

According to a question posed in Ask The Staff there is no IC reason its coded that way.

That post said no such thing.

You wish it did. But it didn't.

Because it is coded that way.

It does not say there is no IC reason why it is coded that way.

Re-read the original question. It was asked if there was an IG reason for it. That was the answer received meaning that it is simply coded that way. If there was an IG reason it should have been answered that there was.

You see, you saying, "If there is no IG reason it should have been answered the way I think it should have been answered." is not only inaccurate, it is comical.

The staff is not required to answer a question the way you believe they should answer it.

The Way is not required to work the way you believe it should work. (For reasons you have still yet to give btw.)

It does not say what you want it to say. End of story. The staff is not required to follow your answering rules, and they didn't.

Their answer could and probably did mean, "It is coded that way, for IG reasons we don't want to and will not tell you. We don't even want to confirm if there are IG reasons, for reasons we aren't required to tell you Silvermoontiger."

Sorry, thus is reality.

Interesting Desertman... Really interesting. I'm sorry I thought this forum was to post ideas of what you thought would improve the code. To ask questions. Not to get a Final answer from another player just because they believe their way is right and yours is wrong.

[Desertman]

According to a question posed in Ask The Staff there is no IC reason its coded that way.

That post said no such thing.

You wish it did. But it didn't.

Because it is coded that way.

It does not say there is no IC reason why it is coded that way.

Re-read the original question. It was asked if there was an IG reason for it. That was the answer received meaning that it is simply coded that way. If there was an IG reason it should have been answered that there was.

You see, you saying, "If there is no IG reason it should have been answered the way I think it should have been answered." is not only inaccurate, it is comical.

The staff is not required to answer a question the way you believe they should answer it.

The Way is not required to work the way you believe it should work. (For reasons you have still yet to give btw.)

It does not say what you want it to say. End of story. The staff is not required to follow your answering rules, and they didn't.

Their answer could and probably did mean, "It is coded that way, for IG reasons we don't want to and will not tell you. We don't even want to confirm if there are IG reasons, for reasons we aren't required to tell you Silvermoontiger."

Sorry, thus is reality.

Interesting Desertman... Really interesting. I'm sorry I thought this forum was to post ideas of what you thought would improve the code. To ask questions. Not to get a Final answer from another player just because they believe their way is right and yours is wrong.

I don't believe you are wrong. I never said it shouldn't work the way you want it to work.

I just really want to hear your reasons for why it should work the way you want it to work. You have yet to give them. Perhaps if you gave your RL psionic experience tales that back why you feel psionic activity in game is not IC'ly accurate, I would be willing to jump on your change train.

Right now, I just see whining and complaining someone annoyed you with a thinly veiled desire to have the GDB back the fact you want to complain about another player, when the staff already shot you down.