Armageddon General Discussion Board

General => Code Discussion => Topic started by: Marc on December 02, 2003, 09:20:09 PM

Title: Worn around neck
Post by: Marc on December 02, 2003, 09:20:09 PM
Suggestion based off http://www.zalanthas.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=5899

1.) Change <worn about throat> to be covered by <worn around neck> like <worn on torso> is covered by <worn around body>.

2.) Make all magicker gems only wearably about throat.

This would let magickers "hide" their status and allow people to wear small charms and necklaces under their heavier gorgets and scarfs.  There is always peek for the sharp eyed.

Could expand this to make <worn on arms> cover the tattoo spots at <left and right shoulder> so long as <worn on shoulder> items would still be visible outside.
Title: Worn around neck
Post by: The7DeadlyVenomz on December 02, 2003, 09:25:17 PM
This is logical. I would also like to see things like removing backpacks echoping that they uncover a tattoo. That tattoo is already covered by a cloak and possibly a vest or armor-piece.
Title: Worn around neck
Post by: spawnloser on December 02, 2003, 11:43:46 PM
I don't think so...about throat is for things that hang down...neck is for things like chokers.  One shouldn't cover the other, I think.
Title: Worn around neck
Post by: DrunkenSalarr on December 03, 2003, 01:16:14 AM
Actually, I think it should depend on the item.

ex. an ascot would cover both throat and neck.  but a choker would cover only one or the other, depending on how high it is worn.
Title: Re: Worn around neck
Post by: Ueda on December 03, 2003, 12:01:17 PM
Quote from: "Marc"
This would let magickers "hide" their status and allow people to wear small charms and necklaces under their heavier gorgets and scarfs.  There is always peek for the sharp eyed.

Hiding your gem is Illegal ... what ever Illegal means in our world of Zalanthas. :) Unless it's the exception to the rule.
Title: Worn around neck
Post by: Marauder Moe on December 03, 2003, 12:14:50 PM
Just because something is illegal doesn't mean it shouldn't be code-supported.  ;)