Armageddon General Discussion Board

General => Code Discussion => Topic started by: EonBlueApocalypse on July 26, 2006, 02:31:29 AM

Title: Emoting++
Post by: EonBlueApocalypse on July 26, 2006, 02:31:29 AM
What if there were a few options added to emoting to differentiate between players/mobiles and items?

Namely:

Item's sdesc, item's possessive form and item's pronoun form.  Seems there are some characters to spare, aren't there?

Just a thought.
Title: Re: Emoting++
Post by: John on July 26, 2006, 02:42:47 AM
Quote from: "EonBlueApocalypse"What if there were a few options added to emoting to differentiate between players/mobiles and items?

Namely:

Item's sdesc, item's possessive form and item's pronoun form.  Seems there are some characters to spare, aren't there?

Just a thought.
Not too sure what you're saying, but items return a "it" when I use !
Title: Emoting++
Post by: Rhyden on July 26, 2006, 02:46:51 AM
~, #, % and ^ work with characters and items both.
Title: Emoting++
Post by: Xygax on July 26, 2006, 03:41:00 AM
Also, you don't have to worry about the item itself seeing your emote formatted incorrectly, so you can safely use "it", "its", etc. without giving offense.

-- X
Title: Emoting++
Post by: EonBlueApocalypse on July 26, 2006, 03:55:05 AM
Quote from: "Xygax"Also, you don't have to worry about the item itself seeing your emote formatted incorrectly, so you can safely use "it", "its", etc. without giving offense.

-- X

That's true.  The suggestion was more or less aimed at eliminating erroneous targets.  One example, which I'm sure is most common, is targeting a cloak and ending up with that guy/girl/rinther over there in the hooded cloak.  But taking your post into consideration, I can see how possessive forms would be plain silliness.
Title: Emoting++
Post by: spawnloser on July 26, 2006, 05:43:59 AM
Actually, posessives are not silly.

> em picks up ~cloak and picks at ^cloak hem.
The ropy, top-knotted man picks up the hooded, city-camouflaged cloak and picks at its hem.
Title: Emoting++
Post by: EonBlueApocalypse on July 26, 2006, 05:49:06 AM
Quote from: "spawnloser"Actually, posessives are not silly.

> em picks up ~cloak and picks at ^cloak hem.
The ropy, top-knotted man picks up the hooded, city-camouflaged cloak and picks at its hem.

In the context of differentiating between player/mobiles and items, rather.  Seeing as you can just type out it/its.
Title: Emoting++
Post by: spawnloser on July 26, 2006, 05:56:07 AM
In that sense, it is pointless to use any of the targetting characters when referring to an object except the ~.
Title: Emoting++
Post by: Hymwen on July 26, 2006, 05:59:36 AM
%cloak is easier than ~cloak's, too.
Title: Emoting++
Post by: Morgenes on July 26, 2006, 09:45:05 AM
Don't forget, use the 'keyword' command (keyword cloak) to figure out what # the cloak you're holding/wearing would be.
Title: Emoting++
Post by: Larrath on July 26, 2006, 10:48:22 AM
Quote from: "Morgenes"Don't forget, use the 'keyword' command (keyword cloak) to figure out what # the cloak you're holding/wearing would be.
But can you use ~.4 cloak?
Title: Emoting++
Post by: Delirium on July 26, 2006, 10:51:23 AM
Quote from: "Larrath"But can you use ~.4 cloak?

Yes.
Title: Emoting++
Post by: Marauder Moe on July 26, 2006, 10:53:27 AM
Quote from: "Delirium"
Quote from: "Larrath"But can you use ~.4 cloak?

Yes.
You sure about that?
Title: Emoting++
Post by: Delirium on July 26, 2006, 10:54:44 AM
Well, with a tiny adjustment of the period, which I assumed was a typo. ;)

~4.cloak works.
Title: Emoting++
Post by: Marauder Moe on July 26, 2006, 10:59:49 AM
Works as in... you believe it works or as in you did it in-game a few minutes ago?
Title: Emoting++
Post by: Delirium on July 26, 2006, 11:07:08 AM
Dude, try it for yourself.

Emote saunters over to ~3.blue and yanks on ~2.green, tossing ~4.white to the table.

Numbers work :)
Title: Emoting++
Post by: Morgenes on July 26, 2006, 11:09:14 AM
> keyword cloak
In the room:
 1.cloak - the tiny and gaunt figure in a dark, hooded cloak

In Inventory:
 2.cloak - a dark, hooded cloak

> :picks at ~2.cloak
Morgenes picks at your dark, hooded cloak.


I wrote it, I've proven it, there, go forth and stop complaining about this.
Title: Emoting++
Post by: Larrath on July 26, 2006, 11:22:19 AM
Wow, I didn't know!

This is sweet.  Thanks! :)
Title: Emoting++
Post by: Marauder Moe on July 26, 2006, 11:25:23 AM
I'm not complaining, it's just that last time (admittedly, a while ago) I tried to emote ~2.something it didn't work, and since then I don't remember seeing an announcement about it being fixed.  (Also, I'm at work so I can't test it.)

So it works with people as well as objects?
Title: Emoting++
Post by: Beux on July 26, 2006, 11:28:15 AM
Even I knew dat. And I'm a newb. Shame I keep getting the numbers wrong though.


Walking slowly towards the tavern door, @ pulls the collar of a very tall figure in a hooded, dirty dustcloak up around his neck.

think krath thats one heavy cloak
Title: Emoting++
Post by: Delirium on July 26, 2006, 11:44:28 AM
Quote from: "Marauder Moe"I'm not complaining, it's just that last time (admittedly, a while ago) I tried to emote ~2.something it didn't work, and since then I don't remember seeing an announcement about it being fixed.  (Also, I'm at work so I can't test it.)

So it works with people as well as objects?

Yes, it works with any keyword.
Title: Emoting++
Post by: rishenko on July 26, 2006, 12:02:25 PM
The 'key' command is especially helpful in clans where you have rooms with 10+ lockers and an ungodly number of chests and trunks.

And it's absolutely wonderful when trying to avoid social faux pas through "keyword hell".
Title: Emoting++
Post by: EonBlueApocalypse on July 26, 2006, 02:37:52 PM
Quote from: "Morgenes"> keyword cloak
In the room:
 1.cloak - the tiny and gaunt figure in a dark, hooded cloak

In Inventory:
 2.cloak - a dark, hooded cloak

> :picks at ~2.cloak
Morgenes picks at your dark, hooded cloak.


I wrote it, I've proven it, there, go forth and stop complaining about this.

Sorry, I'm a n00b.  This is exactly what I was looking for, thanks.