Armageddon General Discussion Board

General => Code Discussion => Topic started by: theebie on April 27, 2006, 08:44:16 AM

Title: contact - recontact
Post by: theebie on April 27, 2006, 08:44:16 AM
how about a new command:

usage: recontact
effect: contact the last persons that tried to contact you with the way.
since its some mindlink it might be possible to make out who contacted you ?

could branch out of contact :)

regards, theebie
Title: contact - recontact
Post by: Larrath on April 27, 2006, 08:45:40 AM
This command could give Psionicists serious trouble.
It will probably end up doing more harm than good.
Title: contact - recontact
Post by: spawnloser on April 27, 2006, 09:06:02 AM
Yeah, I'm against this for reasons that I can not say.
Title: contact - recontact
Post by: jhunter on April 27, 2006, 10:16:28 AM
No.
Title: contact - recontact
Post by: Many Faces on April 27, 2006, 10:36:54 AM
Fuch dat, mang.
Title: contact - recontact
Post by: Halaster on April 27, 2006, 11:13:40 AM
Good idea, Theebie, but I'm with the rest of them - this is something better not done.
Title: contact - recontact
Post by: Nao on April 27, 2006, 11:15:25 AM
I've never played a mindbender, but if something like this is not already in, that would be wicked for those.
Title: contact - recontact
Post by: theebie on April 27, 2006, 04:57:21 PM
How about a spell against this for psionicists ? :)

how about a psi-disguise

psidisguise the red-headed mul

-> the red-headed mul tried to contact you.

(and sorry, i dont know much 'bout psionicists:)

regards, theebie
Title: contact - recontact
Post by: Larrath on April 27, 2006, 05:00:39 PM
This is getting too close to secret game aspects that may or may not exist.

It's great that you take the time to think about new features that would help the game, theebie, and this idea isn't bad really.  However, due to IC things I doubt it would ever be implemented no matter what other features were added.
Title: contact - recontact
Post by: Xygax on April 27, 2006, 05:23:21 PM
This isn't going to happen, and I can't foresee anything other than increasingly IC-content being added to this thread, so I'm going to lock it.

Sorry,
 X