QuoteI'm thinking in the future I'll make a post about playing sponsored roles and antags in a way that's fun for the players involved. I know I haven't played many of these in Armageddon, but my time as a Dungeon Master for around 10+ years gives me a good idea I'd like to think, it's very much in the same area of the DM vs Players debate. And I just think it'll be a good discussion to have because it's important to see other perspectives on these things, especially staff.@Kavrick That sounds like a lovely idea.
Quote from: Usiku on Today at 07:31:09 AMthe vast majority of players are not griefers and are not out just to harm other players. The griefers are rare and few and far between but their actions stick in our memories and cloud our experiences so much more.
Quote from: Tuannon on Today at 03:36:09 AMI did have a question though.. Is a karma review mandatory for playing in Season 1? I'm pretty sure I'd be on somewhere between 4 and 6.
Quote from: frankjacoby on May 22, 2024, 08:21:05 PMAt the risk of being controversial, will we resort to handing out roles to the same old people as before? I am speaking of the same people who, because they didn't like the fact that seasons was going to be a thing, decided to take their ball and go home?
There were a few die hards trying to keep it going until the bitter end.
Quote from: Bogre on Today at 08:17:41 AMQuote from: Dresan on Today at 12:28:17 AMI also fear that wide spread anonymity will result in bias or outright cheating by both players and staff to help learn or identify m-desc hidden players. This type of cheating is pure poison for the game and is best avoided all together. Equally, limiting the gear to certain clans for special purposes defeats the entire purpose of having them at all since clans should have less need for anonymity.
That said if this goes in, I can't wait to see unconscious nobles lying naked on the ground. Probably not the intended outcome, but utterly hilarious none the less.
...
There aren't typically unconscious nobles lying around everywhere, assassinations of nobles is exceptionally rare. Why exactly do you except the streets to suddenly be littered with them ?
Quote from: Dresan on Today at 12:28:17 AMI also fear that wide spread anonymity will result in bias or outright cheating by both players and staff to help learn or identify m-desc hidden players. This type of cheating is pure poison for the game and is best avoided all together. Equally, limiting the gear to certain clans for special purposes defeats the entire purpose of having them at all since clans should have less need for anonymity.
That said if this goes in, I can't wait to see unconscious nobles lying naked on the ground. Probably not the intended outcome, but utterly hilarious none the less.
Quote from: dumbstruck on Today at 03:39:14 AMI don't think you are necessarily. I've seen this from the top down with a larger playerbase even. All it takes is 3 or 4 people that you neither curtail nor speak with to ruin the fun for everyone. Remember, these are people who will run off into the silt sea specifically to get better stats. Probably people who exploited that spice stat character creation bug. I honestly think that making dwarves require karma is gonna do a lot but so would stuff like flagging people to have X or Y guild not be available if they're griefing with it. It would only need to be an extreme minority to fit this as long as their respective playtimes were high enough there'd be someone on most to all hours of the day with it just a handful of people. I'm sure it will result in something greater at this point and they've now made rules about stuff they'll even have something specific to point at for the why. It could feel like a lot more and worse than it really is if that person's current grief puppet is spamming around your area. It only takes 1.
Page created in 0.017 seconds with 14 queries.